Former Vice-President Atiku Abubakar has been urged to reconsider his 2027 presidential ambition, with former presidential aide Laolu Akande arguing that personal ambition and political ego could undermine efforts to unite Nigeria’s opposition parties against the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC).
Akande made the appeal during an appearance on the Naija Unfiltered Podcast, where he drew comparisons between President Bola Tinubu’s political journey and the challenges facing opposition leaders ahead of the 2027 general election.
The former senior media aide to ex-Vice-President Yemi Osinbajo argued that Atiku, as one of the country’s prominent opposition figures, should be prepared to make personal sacrifices if doing so would help establish a united front.
According to a report by BusinessDay published on October 24, Akande maintained that opposition leaders must look beyond individual ambitions and focus on building a political arrangement capable of challenging the APC.
His comments have renewed debate over whether Atiku and other opposition figures can agree on a common candidate before the next presidential election.
Why Akande Wants Atiku to Reconsider His Ambition
Akande identified what he described as ego and personal ambition as major obstacles to opposition unity.
He argued that Atiku should take the initiative in efforts to bring opposition politicians together, even if that means stepping aside from the presidential race.
The former presidential aide said the opposition needed leaders who were willing to put collective political objectives ahead of personal aspirations.
Akande’s argument centres on the possibility that competing presidential ambitions could weaken cooperation among opposition parties and prevent them from presenting a unified challenge to President Tinubu.
He suggested that Atiku could demonstrate political leadership by being willing to sacrifice his own ambition if a broader opposition arrangement required a different candidate.
The comments come amid continuing discussions about how opposition parties can resolve disagreements over leadership, party platforms and the selection of a presidential flagbearer.
Akande Uses Tinubu’s Political Journey as an Example
To support his argument, Akande pointed to Tinubu’s experience within the APC during the administration of former President Muhammadu Buhari.
Akande alleged that Tinubu was marginalised by influential figures within the ruling party between 2015 and 2023, despite his role in the political coalition that brought Buhari to power.
He claimed that he witnessed occasions when Tinubu was sidelined during meetings and said some individuals he reportedly recommended for ministerial positions were not selected.
According to Akande, Tinubu did not abandon the APC despite those alleged setbacks. Instead, he remained in the party, continued organising politically and eventually secured its presidential ticket for the 2023 election.
Akande argued that opposition leaders should learn from that experience by developing the patience, organisation and willingness to compromise needed to build a successful political movement.
His account of Tinubu’s treatment during Buhari’s administration represents Akande’s own recollection and allegations. The specific incidents he described have not been independently established in the reports reviewed.
Opposition Unity Remains a Major Challenge Ahead of 2027
The question of a common opposition candidate has become an important issue as political parties prepare for the 2027 general election.
Several opposition figures have expressed interest in the presidency, while discussions about alliances and possible consensus arrangements have faced disagreements over which candidate should lead.
Atiku remains a prominent opposition politician and has previously said he would be willing to respect the outcome of a coalition process, including stepping aside for another candidate if necessary.
However, the broader question of how political parties would negotiate a common platform, agree on a candidate and manage competing interests remains unresolved.
Political disagreements have also emerged over whether decisions should be made by individual candidates or through formal negotiations between the parties involved.
The challenge is not limited to choosing a presidential candidate. Any potential alliance would also need to address party structures, political commitments and the interests of supporters across different regions.
Akande’s intervention adds to calls for opposition leaders to prioritise cooperation over individual ambitions as the election approaches.
What Atiku Has Said About Stepping Aside
Atiku has previously indicated that the 2027 election could be his final attempt at the presidency.
In an April 2026 interview with Arise News, the former vice-president said he would be prepared to step aside for another candidate who emerged through an opposition coalition process.
He specifically indicated that he could accept an outcome involving Peter Obi, while maintaining that the selection process should determine who leads the alliance.
That position suggests Atiku has publicly acknowledged the possibility of compromise, although disagreements among opposition parties have complicated efforts to establish a unified arrangement.
Akande’s latest comments therefore place renewed emphasis on whether opposition leaders can translate statements supporting unity into a workable political agreement.
Why the Debate Matters for the 2027 Election
The discussion over Atiku’s ambition reflects a wider debate about opposition coordination in Nigeria.
Supporters of a unified ticket argue that cooperation could reduce competition between opposition candidates and allow them to concentrate their resources on a common campaign.
However, bringing different parties and political figures together requires agreement on leadership, policy priorities and the process for selecting a candidate.
A decision by Atiku or any other contender to step aside would not, by itself, guarantee a united opposition. The parties would still need to negotiate the terms of their cooperation and secure support from their respective members.
For now, Akande’s remarks represent a call for compromise rather than an announcement that Atiku has withdrawn from the 2027 contest.
The former vice-president has not been reported to have abandoned his presidential ambition in response to the latest appeal. The next phase of opposition negotiations will determine whether calls for sacrifice translate into a concrete agreement ahead of the election.
.webp)